Rachel Savernake #4
Publisher: Head of Zeus – an Aries book
448 pages
Blurb
How can you solve a murder before it's happened?
'This is my challenge for you,' the woman in white said. 'I want you to solve
my murder.'
London, 1930s: Rachel Savernake has been invited to a private view of an art
exhibition at a fashionable gallery. The artist, Damaris Gethin, known as 'the
Queen of Surrealism', is debuting a show featuring live models pretending to be
waxworks of famous killers. Before her welcoming speech, Damaris asks a
haunting favour of the amateur sleuth: she wants Rachel to solve her murder. As
Damaris takes to a stage set with a guillotine, the lights go out. There is a
cry and the blade falls. Damaris has executed herself.
While Rachel questions why Damaris would take her own life - and just what she
meant by 'solve my murder' - fellow party guest Jacob Flint is chasing a lead
on a glamorous socialite with a sordid background. As their paths merge, this case
of false identities, blackmail, and fedora-adorned doppelgängers, will descend
upon a grand home on Sepulchre Street, where nothing - and no one - is quite
what it seems.
Review
“Life without danger isn’t worth living” – Rachel Savernake
The opening of this book couldn’t be more fascinating. Damaris Gethin, surrealist artist and very much alive, asks Rachel to investigate her murder. Although she refuses to part with any more information, Rachel can’t refuse the challenge she’s been set. Things get confusing when Damaris subsequently commits suicide by guillotine, but Rachel is determined to keep her word. Damaris may have killed herself, but somebody drove her to it, and Rachel will find out who and why.
Journalist Jacob Flint would love an interview with the gorgeous Kiki de Villiers. Damaris’s death spoils his chances on that particular night, and things only get more complicated when Kiki vanishes from London, initially to parts unknown.
And thus starts a story that is at least as much thriller as it is puzzle-mystery. I suspect that the author took at least some inspiration from Christie’s Tommy and Tuppence when he created Rachel and Jacob, with Rachel being intellectually superior and Jacob being prone to finding himself in harm’s way. Having said that, while it is clear that Jacob is rather taken with Rachel, there is (at this point) no sign of a romantic relationship.
There is A LOT going on in this story. We have gangsters, murder, prostitution, people smuggling, a mysterious ‘very important person’, and blackmail for starters. And until almost the end of the story, Rachel and Jacob’s investigations appear to be unconnected. Except that of course they aren’t and the way in which it is all pulled together is masterful.
I’m very impressed that despite a large and at first glance unconnected cast of characters, I never lost track of who was who. It takes a great writer to present the various protagonists in such a way that the reader can easily follow what’s happening to whom, even if the whys aren’t disclosed until the very end.
I liked that the book ended with a ‘clue finder’. Apparently, it was commonplace during the Golden Age of Mystery to spell out the various clues contained in the story in an appendix-like chapter. Martin Edwards does the same here and for me it was a case of discovering that I had picked up on about half of them while the other half went completely over my head. I don’t mind. Part of the fun of a mystery for me is the fact that I’ve been outsmarted by the author.
Long review short: this was a fabulous read. What’s not to love about a story in which the mysteries are well plotted, the clues are there for the observant reader, and one of the main characters is as intriguing and mysterious as the cases she investigates.
Once again, I read a series book out of order. This time I can honestly say that it didn’t matter. At no point did I feel as if I was missing vital (or even trivial) information. What’s more, I can also say without a shadow of doubt that I will read the three earlier titles as well as any future Rachel Savernake stories. If only because I’m now VERY curious about Rachel’s personal story and background.
No comments:
Post a Comment